![]() Now, it seems very obvious, but it was something that I searched for. It was very important to find this analogy. ![]() is a manifestation of what the ring does to an individual. For me, whenever I get into a role, that's very important. Serkis' book is a lively look at how he, the writers, directors, and animators worked together to make Gollum entirely believable and real.īookselling This Week recently had the opportunity to speak to Andy Serkis during a visit to New York to promote the film version of The Return of the King and his new book.īTW: In your book, you refer to Gollum as a "ring junkie." Why is that?Ī.S.: As part of the acting process, one tries to find touchstone characters or people or real things that an audience will associate with. The result was an animated character that has the subtle movements and emotional range of a human being. And, by the time the third film was shot, animators were converting Serkis' movements real-time to film. Or perhaps, Gollum was more like Serkis, as the animators ultimately recreated the creature's facial muscles and structure to align more closely with Serkis' face. In Gollum, Serkis details how his role in the film evolved from being hired to provide only the voice of an animated creature to the point where, in many ways, he was the Gollum that the audience sees on film. The magic behind the on-screen Gollum is detailed in a new title from Houghton Mifflin, Gollum: How We Made Movie Magic by actor Andy Serkis, aka Gollum, in The Lord of the Rings movie trilogy. Lord of the Rings movie fans who assume the character Gollum is simply the creation of some software, a man at a keyboard, and a group of animators are in for a bit of a surprise: Gollum is more human (and hobbit) than might be imagined.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |